An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

John Locke

About this work

Locke's , published in 1689, is the founding text of British empiricism. Its governing claim is negative: the mind at birth contains no innate ideas, no principles stamped on the soul before experience begins. Everything we know arrives through sensation or reflection, and the task of philosophy is to trace our ideas back to these sources and to mark the boundaries of what we can and cannot know.

Book I demolishes innate ideas. Books II and III do the constructive work. Book II catalogs the materials of thought: simple ideas received passively from sensation (color, sound, solidity) and from reflection (thinking, willing), then complex ideas formed by the mind's own activity (substances, modes, relations). Locke's treatment of personal identity, placed here among the chapters on identity and diversity, defines the self as continuity of consciousness rather than continuity of substance. Book III takes up language: words are signs of ideas, not of things, and much confusion in philosophy arises from treating them otherwise. The theory of abstract ideas and the doctrine of nominal versus real essence lay groundwork that Berkeley and Hume will contest within a generation.

Book IV defines knowledge as the perception of agreement or disagreement among ideas and distinguishes it from probable opinion. The range of genuine knowledge turns out to be narrow; most of what we call knowledge is really well-founded belief. Locke is candid about this, and the candor is the point. The Essay does not so much limit human understanding as map it honestly, separating what reason can establish from what it cannot, and directing inquiry toward where it is likely to bear fruit.

Appears in 37 ideas

Epistemology/Philosophy of Mind

Theology

Metaphysics/Ethics

Philosophy

Science

Ethics

Metaphysics

Epistemology

Logic & Method

Natural Science

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.